Mancho Suarez Bidondo c / Ozor, Carlos s / Od. S / inc. Exec.Judgement.Commercial Camara 07/05/1990: B1. The law 14394: 38 establishes the principle to be seized or unenforceabilitythe homestead for debts of enrollment.As such, rule, meaning a "negative implication" implies the possibility ofseize and run that well before your enrollment credits. Moreover, since they are contractual obligations, the source of the credit depends on the date of the contract. 2. The axis of the unseizabilityin property subject to the regime of "homestead" is represented by the principle in order to which the commitments are fine on the registrationafter the only losing enforceability. Therefore, since they are contractual obligations, the chronological origin of the credit arising from the date ofcontract. Guzman, Julio C / Villar, nilda s / Exec. Rent. (Ed 3.2.2000, Application 49822) 06/10/1998 Civil Chamber: F
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
Pilladas En La Calle En Paris
expense: Debt Collection -
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment